Ulster University Logo

“A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life

de Witt Jensen, Banin, Brazil, Kevin, McIlfatrick, Sonja, Passmore P, Peter, Buchanan, Hilary, Watson, Max and Parsons C, Carole (2016) “A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life. Palliative Medicine, 30 (6). NP37-NP37. [Journal article]

Full text not available from this repository.

URL: http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/30/6.toc

DOI: 10.1177/0269216316646056


Background: People dying with advanced dementia areoften unable to effectively self-report pain and are at riskof under-assessment which may hinder pain diagnosis andmanagement. Pain assessment tools for use in advanceddementia are available but their use by physicians withdying patients has not been explored.Aims: To explore hospice, secondary and primary carephysicians’ use of pain assessment tools with patientsdying with advanced dementia.Methods: Twenty-three, semi-structured, face-to-facephysician interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim.Thematic analysis was applied to identify corethemes across healthcare settings. Three researchers verifiedfinal themes.Results: Four key themes emerged: non-use of painassessment tools; perceived limitations of tools; clinicaloutcomes of use and improving pain assessment. Physiciansdid not routinely use pain assessment tools withpatients dying with advanced dementia. Information fromphysical examination, physiological parameters andpatient observation in addition to collateral patient historyfrom families and nursing staff were perceived to providea more reliable and holistic approach to assessment andmanagement. Scoring subjectivity, proxy-reporting andoverreliance on nonverbal and behavioural cues were limitationsassociated with pain tools. Physicians perceived theclinical outcome of pain tool use to be quicker identificationand reporting of pain by nurses. Most physiciansbelieved pain assessment could be improved via betterintegration of secondary, hospice and primary care servicesin addition to ongoing medical education andmentoring.Conclusion: Physicians preferred clinical investigationand collateral patient history from family and other healthprofessionals to assess pain and guide management. Thesefindings have important implications for medical education,practice and health policy.Funding: HSC Research and Development Division, PublicHealth Agency, Northern Ireland.

Item Type:Journal article
Keywords:Pain assessment; dementia; end of life; physician
Faculties and Schools:Faculty of Life and Health Sciences > School of Nursing
Faculty of Life and Health Sciences
Research Institutes and Groups:Institute of Nursing and Health Research
Institute of Nursing and Health Research > Managing Chronic Illness Research Centre
ID Code:34947
Deposited By: Professor Sonja McIlfatrick
Deposited On:04 Jul 2016 13:49
Last Modified:25 Jul 2017 10:27

Repository Staff Only: item control page