Ulster University Logo

Cross-Contamination of Residual Emerging Contaminants and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in Lettuce Crops and Soil Irrigated with Wastewater Treated by Sunlight/H2O2

Ferro, Giovanna, Polo-López, María I., Martínez-Piernas, Ana B., Fernandez-Ibanez, Pilar, Agüera, Ana and Rizzo, Luigi (2015) Cross-Contamination of Residual Emerging Contaminants and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in Lettuce Crops and Soil Irrigated with Wastewater Treated by Sunlight/H2O2. Environmental Science & Technology, 49 (18). pp. 11096-11104. [Journal article]

Full text not available from this repository.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02613

DOI: doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02613

Abstract

The sunlight/H2O2 process has recently been considered as a sustainable alternative option compared toother solar driven advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in advanced treatment of municipal wastewater (WW) to be reused for crop irrigation. Accordingly, in this study sunlight/H2O2 was used as disinfection/oxidation treatment for urban WW treatment plant effluent in a compound parabolic collector photoreactor to assess subsequent cross-contamination of lettuce and soil by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) (determined by QuEChERS extraction and LCQqLIT-MS/MS analysis) and antibiotic resistant (AR) bacteria after irrigation with treated WW. Three CECs (carbamazepine (CBZ), flumequine (FLU), and thiabendazole (TBZ) at 100 μg L−1) and two AR bacterial strains (E. coli and E. faecalis, at 105 CFU mL−1) were spiked in real WW. A detection limit (DL) of 2 CFU mL−1 was reached after 120 min of solar exposure for AR E. coli, while AR E. faecalis was more resistant to the disinfection process (240 min to reach DL). CBZ and TBZ were poorly removed after 90 min (12% and 50%, respectively) compared to FLU (94%). Lettuce was irrigated with treated WW for 5 weeks.CBZ and TBZ were accumulated in soil up to 472 ng g−1 and 256 ng g−1 and up-taken by lettuce up to 109 and 18 ng g−1, respectively, when 90 min treated WW was used for irrigation; whereas no bacteria contamination was observed when the bacterial density in treated WW was below the DL. A proper treatment time (>90 min) should be guaranteed in order to avoid the transfer of pathogens from disinfected WW to irrigated crops and soil.

Item Type:Journal article
Keywords:Antimicrobial resistance bacteria, wastewater reuse, cross contamination, antibiotics
Faculties and Schools:Faculty of Computing & Engineering > School of Engineering
Faculty of Computing & Engineering
Research Institutes and Groups:Engineering Research Institute
Engineering Research Institute > Nanotechnology & Integrated BioEngineering Centre (NIBEC)
ID Code:36777
Deposited By: Dr Pilar Fernandez-Ibanez
Deposited On:15 Feb 2017 13:59
Last Modified:15 Feb 2017 13:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page