Volume 66, Issue 1, 15 April 2007, Pages 71–86

Special Issue on the 5th International Workshop on System/Software Architectures (IWSSA’06)

Edited By L. Chung and N. Subramanian

Designing and managing evolving systems using a MAS product line approach

  • a University of Seville, E.T.S.I. Informática, Dpto. de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos, Avda. de la Reina Mercedes s/n, Sevilla, 41.012, Spain
  • b NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Information Systems Division, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
  • c School of Computing and Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB, United Kingdom

Abstract

We view an evolutionary system as being a software product line. The core architecture is the unchanging part of the system, and each version of the system may be viewed as a product from the product line. Each “product” may be described as the core architecture with some agent-based additions. The result is a multiagent system software product line. We describe an approach to such a software product line-based approach using the MaCMAS agent-oriented methodology. The approach scales to enterprise architectures as a multiagent system is an appropriate means of representing a changing enterprise architecture and the interaction between components in it. In addition, we reduce the gap between the enterprise architecture and the software architecture.

Keywords

  • Multiagent systems product lines;
  • Enterprise architecture evolution;
  • Swarm-based systems

References

    • [1]
    • S. Brueckner, H.V.D. Parunak, Resource-aware exploration of the emergent dynamics of simulated systems, in: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS, 2003, pp. 781–788
    • [2]
    • K. Czarnecki, U. Eisenecker
    • Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications

    • Addison-Wesley (2000)

    • [3]
    • D. D’Souza, A. Wills
    • Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach

    • Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1999)

    • [4]
    • A. Jansen, R. Smedinga, J. van Gurp, J. Bosch
    • First class feature abstractions for product derivation

    • IEE Proceedings — Software, 151 (4) (2004), pp. 187–198

    • [5]
    • K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, A. Peterson, Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study, Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, November 1990
    • [6]
    • E.A. Kendall
    • Role modeling for agent system analysis, design, and implementation

    • IEEE Concurrency, 8 (2) (2000), pp. 34–41

    • [7]
    • B. Liskov, J.M. Wing
    • Specifications and their use in defining subtypes

    • Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, ACM Press (1993), pp. 16–28

    • [8]
    • J. Odell, FIPA, The FIPA agent UML web site, since 2003. Available at www.auml.org
    • [9]
    • J. Odell, H.V.D. Parunak, M. Fleischer
    • The role of roles in designing effective agent organisations

    • ,in: A. Garcia, C.L.F.Z.A.O.J. Castro (Eds.), Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems, LNCS, vol. 2603, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2003), pp. 27–28

    • [10]
    • H.V.D. Parunak, J. Odell
    • Representing social structures in UML

    • J.P. Müller, E. Andre, S. Sen, C. Frasson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, ACM Press, Montreal, Canada (2001), pp. 100–101

    • [11]
    • J. Peña, On improving the modelling of complex acquaintance organisations of agents. A method fragment for the analysis phase. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Seville, 2005
    • [12]
    • J. Peña, R. Corchuelo, J.L. Arjona
    • Towards interaction protocol operations for large multi-agent systems

    • Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems, LNAI, FAABS 2002, NASA-GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USA, vol. 2699, Springer-Verlag (2002), pp. 79–91

    • [13]
    • J. Peña, M.G. Hinchey, A. Ruiz-Cortes
    • Multiagent system product lines: Challenges and benefits

    • Communications of the ACM, 49 (12) (2006), pp. 82–84

    • [14]
    • J. Peña, M.G. Hinchey, A. Ruiz-Cortes, P. Trinidad, Building the core architecture of a NASA multiagent system product line, in: 7th International Workshop on Agent Oriented Software Engineering 2006, Hakodate, Japan, in: LNCS, May 2006 (in press)
    • [15]
    • K. Pohl, G. Bockle, F. van der Linden
    • Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques

    • Springer (September 2005)

    • [16]
    • T. Reenskaug
    • Working with Objects: The OOram Software Engineering Method

    • Manning Publications (1996)

    • [17]
    • C. Rouff, M. Hinchey, W. Truszkowski, J. Rash
    • Experiences applying formal approaches in the development of swarm-based space exploration systems

    • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 8 (6) (2006), pp. 587–603

    • [18]
    • C. Rouff, A. Vanderbilt, M. Hinchey, W. Truszkowski, J. Rash, Formal methods for swarm and autonomic systems, in: Proc. 1st International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, ISoLA, Oct 30–Nov 2, Cyprus, 2004
    • [19]
    • C.A. Rouff, W.F. Truszkowski, J.L. Rash, M.G. Hinchey, A survey of formal methods for intelligent swarms, Technical Report TM-2005-212779, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 2005
    • [20]
    • Y. Smaragdakis, D. Batory
    • Mixin layers: an object-oriented implementation technique for refinements and collaboration-based designs

    • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11 (2) (2002), pp. 215–255

    • [21]
    • F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, M. Wooldridge
    • Developing multiagent systems: The GAIA methodology

    • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 12 (3) (2003), pp. 317–370

This work has been partially supported by the European Commission (FEDER) and Spanish Government under CICYT project Web-Factories (TIN2006-00472) and TIC200302737C0201, by the NASA Software Engineering Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

Corresponding author contact information
Corresponding author.
1

Also at: Loyola College, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.